LIVE STATUSTata fab past halfway·Airport ~80%·Solar 300 MW live·Rail CCEA-approvedas of Jul 2026
Home / FAQ

Dholera, answered

Sourced answers to the questions people actually ask, grouped by topic.

People arrive at Dholera with the same handful of worries: is it real, can I trust the plot, what will it cost, what are the rules for an NRI, and what can actually be built here. We grouped the real questions by topic and answered each from sourced facts rather than sales copy, tagging every figure and dating it. Pick a topic below. If your exact question is not there, the glossary explains the vocabulary and the sources page shows where every number comes from, so you can always trace an answer back to its origin rather than take it on faith. The categories below cover the basics, the mega-projects, buying and verification, NRI rules, setting up industry, and the future and its risks, so start with whichever matches your situation and follow the links from there. Because in Dholera the money question, the compliance question and the timing question are usually the same question seen from three angles, the answers are written to be read together rather than in isolation. None of it is sales copy: where a fact is not reliably known we say so, targets stay labelled as targets, and every figure carries the source and the date so you can check it yourself before you act on it.

How this page is sourced

Everything on this site is held to one standard so you can trust it enough to act on. Every figure is tagged by where it comes from: green for government or official sources, amber for national or trade press, and red for broker or unverified claims, which we flag rather than repeat as fact. Every figure carries a date, because Dholera moves and a number that was right last year may not hold now. Anything framed as a future event, an opening, a first chip, a completion, stays labelled as a target until a government source confirms it happened. We do not sell plots, we do not publish invented reviews or registration numbers, and where a fact is not reliably available we say so instead of guessing. The full method and the primary sources are on the sources and methodology page.

Read the tags as a confidence meter. A green figure is something you can plan against today. An amber figure is credible but worth confirming before you build a decision on it. A red figure is a claim we are showing you so that you can recognise it, not one we stand behind. When two sources disagree, we say so and show the more authoritative one rather than averaging them into a number that is nobody's actual figure. The point of all of this is simple: you should be able to act on what you read here, and check any of it yourself, without wondering whether a number was quietly invented to make the picture look better than it is.